Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Valuation discounts in estate planning has permitted the transfer of assets from one generation to another in an economically efficient manner. Two of the various discount methods claim lack of control (minority interest discount) and lack of marketability. The IRS has traditionally objected to these approaches in intra-family transfers, while Congress has attempted to legislate away these “loopholes” unsuccessfully and the Treasury Department is contemplating new regulations to accomplish this goal.
In the past, the IRS position was that a minority interest discount was not available in valuing an interest in an entity (corporation, partnership or limited liability company) that was controlled by family members. Revenue Ruling 93-12 reflects that the IRS was unsuccessful maintaining that position. The fact pattern of that ruling involved a shareholder who owned100% of a corporation made gifts of 20% of the stock to each of his five children. The IRS ruled that the family's control of the entity would not be considered in valuing the gifts of minority interests. After the ruling, family limited partnerships (FLPs) and limited liability companies (LLCs) became more popular estate planning vehicles because the available valuation discounts allowed for more wealth to be transferred free from estate, gift and generation skipping transfer (GST) taxes.
Government Efforts
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?