Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Let's face it. Law firms are neophytes at using competitive intelligence (CI) to inform strategic business decisions. It has been only three decades since law firms hired the first full-time, dedicated marketing professionals; and much less since they began relying on CI professionals to track industry or client trends. Law firms are just now learning how to incorporate CI into decision-making, rather than relying solely on tradition, individual partners' pet passions or anecdotal perceptions of “what's hot.” The resources, tools and professionals performing CI in the legal industry have come a long way. Yet we still have a long way to go.
In the research industry, we have a saying: “Our biggest competitor is bad research.” Bad research takes many forms. It may be the study that announces a newsworthy, and often counterintuitive, statistic based on a sample size of 16. Or the assertion that market growth in an area of state litigation has flatlined, only to learn that the research tool does not aggregate the most active county's data. Or ' my favorite ' the exciting finding that your competitor is the absolute best at XX from a researcher who interviewed just three of its clients. Ah, the list is seemingly endless, which is why, in a world where information has become the backbone of decision-making (and rightly so), it is that much more important to quickly ascertain what's worth listening to ' and what's not.
This article enumerates the most common pitfalls in any research study to help you ensure the information you and your firm rely on is the best available, and used properly.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.