Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
So what else is new? According to the International Association of Defense Counsel (IADC) 2015 Inside/Outside Counsel Relationship Survey, ” ' corporate legal departments and their outside counsel have inconsistent views of key relationship factors ' .” According to an article in the Dec/Jan 2016 Today's General Counsel, the survey ” ' demonstrates that in-house counsel are looking to outside counsel to become more like business partners in providing legal services.”
This should be of absolutely no surprise to anyone familiar with annual surveys of in-house counsel. In one form or another, the number one or number two response by GCs to the question of the most important characteristics needed from their outside counsel, is understanding our business and becoming our business partner.
Is the Message Being Lost?
“Good communications between inside and outside counsel is essential to understanding the expectations of in-house counsel at the onset” stated attorneys quoted in the article. But in our firm's U.S. and Canada survey regarding Client Retention, 36% of the outside attorneys indicated that they lost clients based on faulty or nonexistent communications on their part ' yes 36%! So why are they not getting the message?
I am convinced that the answer lies in the fact that the outside attorneys do not ask themselves or their clients and prospects the following questions to identify the business relationship needs and communications required to maintain healthy client relationships:
In summary, do you understand their needs? What are the pressures going on inside that company? Is the board of directors looking over the GC's shoulders? Have their competitors introduced a “market-busting” new product or service? Knowing all of these answers will help you get and keep clients and new clients.
Conclusion
An attorney once said to me, “I get good results; what else is needed?” The answer is included in the above questions and is why outside counsel need to care.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.