Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
“Every two days, we create as much information as we did from the dawn of civilization up until 2003,” said Google CEO Eric Schmidt at a 2010 tech conference. This was five years ago. Imagine what it is today.
This onslaught of information, in addition to taxing our systems and negatively impacting our attention spans, requires each and every one of us to act as an analyst, at least in the most basic sense, on an almost daily basis. In Part One of this series, we explored the most common pitfalls inherent in the collection of data, its related sources and how these can bias or lead to an inaccurate interpretation of the facts.
Herein, we will explore the next frontier ' once we have the data, how do we ensure that we analyze it appropriately?
CI Functions
Law firms today are on the cusp of building more sophisticated CI functions ' the kind that have the power to create true competitive advantage. A few may even be accomplishing it. Yet just as the data and resources available to law firms have a long way to go, so too does the analytical engine that transforms this data into valuable, strategic insight. So what's holding them back?
1. Poor, or No, Analytical Skills
We've all seen it. The litigator who fancies herself a statistician. Or the marketing manager whose one course in college makes him or her an expert. Given that the typical person uses data on a daily basis, it is no wonder we all feel empowered to interpret information. It is our job. Yet transforming disparate pieces of information into a comprehensive understanding of a situation is hardly a simple task. The best analysts are typically balanced right- and left-brained thinkers who bring creativity and perspective to the rigor of quantitative analysis.
Law firms today employ few professional analysts, and strategic analysis in this data-rich age is conspicuously absent. Of those law firms that do have analytical horsepower, many unfortunately succumb to other missteps, such as failing to expend the resources required or poorly articulating the underlying objective. No matter the driver, the result is the same: information, not insights. (Or worse, opinions without fact.)
2. Irresponsible Data Manipulation
Anyone who has ever worked heavily with data sets knows that manipulating data is a near art form. We have boasted in the halls of our consulting/accounting/research firms about how we were able to support or refute a particular hypothesis or uncover an unexpected correlation through the sheer power of our unparalleled coding skills. We know too that many among us probably could return to the same data set with a contradictory mandate and yield an equally powerful result. In other words, data can lie.
Knowing how to manipulate data without being manipulative requires more than a fundamental understanding of statistics. It demands a responsible approach and a keen understanding of what I like to call “the question behind the question.” This kind of skill set is a rare one, as are the environments in which they flourish (see next point).
3. Missing the Big Picture
The typical law firm CI function often (unnecessarily) erects a barrier between the researcher and end user of information. On one side of the abyss are the researchers (you know, us nerdy types who enjoy crunching numbers and whom firms like to shelter from the light of day). On the other side are the lawyers, practice group heads and firm management who are increasingly demanding data to support strategic decisions. Bridging the chasm are the “translators” ' BD folks, marketers, practice managers ' whose job it is to review information and translate it into something palatable for the attorneys.
This structure is a mistake. Disconnecting those savvy at interpreting data from those seeking to find meaning in the data can render the data all but useless. Without the big picture, even the best analyst can deliver irrelevant insights. Savvy firms overcome this challenge by ensuring that CI has a seat at the table. Include a CI team member in key meetings and conversations where leaders are discussing their strategic objectives, whether or not a specific data request has been made. Seasoned analysts will not only benefit from inclusion, but also be able to add value in the form of ideas, approaches and available resources to enhance the conversation. Everybody wins.
Conclusion
The ultra-competitive legal landscape is here. Just as corporations as diverse as Amazon, Google, Proctor & Gamble and GEICO use data analysis to inform their strategic decisions, so too will tomorrow's law firms. A sophisticated law firm's CI team has the power to create competitive advantage. In today's marketplace, why leave this edge to chance?
Marcie Borgal Shunk, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is a Senior Consultant at LawVision Group and member of the Legal Marketing Association's Board of Directors.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.