Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Contradicting the ordinary rules of supply and demand, law firms have continued to jack up hourly fees faster than flat demand and a projected 1.7% annual inflation rate would suggest. See, “United States Inflation Rate: Forecast 2016-2020,” Trading Economics.
According to a survey of 180 large U.S.-based firms released last month by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, demand for services grew a negligible 0.3% in the first half of the year. At the same time, Citi found, average rates per hour have grown by 3.2%, surpassing last year's 3.1% hourly average price increase. See, “Citi Report: Growth Slowed in the Second Quarter,” AmLaw Daily (Aug. 15, 2016).
The findings echo those by Thomson Reuters' Peer Monitor in August, and the rate trend seems likely to continue. See, “Warning Signs for Big Firms as Report Sees Demand Drop-Off.” Citi noted in its report that “rate increases will likely be the key drivers of full-year profitability growth in 2016.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?