Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
First the copyright infringement case over the use of Abbott and Costello's “Who's on First” routine in a Broadway play was dismissed by a New York federal judge. Then it rounded the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, but was tagged out again. Now, in its third at bat, the lawsuit struck out with the U.S. Supreme Court declining to review the case.
The High Court denied the plaintiffs TCA Television Corp., Hi Neighbor and Diana Abbott Colton's petition for a writ of certiorari, which claimed that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was wrong to uphold the dismissal of the case against the creators of the play Hand to God.
The play, authored by Robert Askins, is the story of Jason, a shy and repressed boy with a satanic sock puppet named Tyrone. Jason performs segments of the legendary Abbott and Lou Costello comedy routine, slightly over a minute in all, to impress a girl in his very religious hometown. When Jason fibs that he made up the routine himself, Tyrone calls him out on the lie.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?