Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

BONUS CONTENT: High Court May Limit the Reach of the Wire Fraud Statute: Post-Argument Update Image

BONUS CONTENT: High Court May Limit the Reach of the Wire Fraud Statute: Post-Argument Update

Harry Sandick & Caitlyn Wigler

A follow up to the article on a briefing in 'Kousisis v. United States' before the U.S. Supreme Court that considers the viability of the fraudulent inducement theory. Arguments before the Court took place on Dec. 9, and the authors provide an update.

Features

Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement At the Supreme Court Image

Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement At the Supreme Court

Catherine Nyarady & Crystal Parker

In February 2024, the Fourth Circuit addressed a jury’s 2020 damages award of $1 billion finding Cox secondarily liable for its subscribers’ copyright infringement through illegal copying of copyrighted songs. Both Cox and Sony filed petitions for certiorari.

Features

High Court May Limit the Reach of the Wire Fraud Statute Image

High Court May Limit the Reach of the Wire Fraud Statute

Harry Sandick & Caitlyn Wigler

On Dec. 9, 2024, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Kousisis v. United States, a case that will again review the reach of the federal mail and wire fraud statutes. At issue this time is the so-called “fraudulent inducement” theory of property fraud — namely, whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if the infliction of economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme.

Features

Impact of Supreme Court's Ruling On Expert Intent Testimony In 'Diaz v. United States' Image

Impact of Supreme Court's Ruling On Expert Intent Testimony In 'Diaz v. United States'

Bonnie M. Baker

The Supreme Court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether "most people" similar to the defendant have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of the Federal Rule of Evidence's prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant's intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.

Features

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Developers and Property Owners to Challenge Excessive or Unjustified Impact Fees Image

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Developers and Property Owners to Challenge Excessive or Unjustified Impact Fees

Mark Grafton

The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado will cause many local governments to revisit the defensibility of their impact fee regimes.

Features

Supreme Court Puts End to Prudential Barriers In Chapter 11 Appeals Image

Supreme Court Puts End to Prudential Barriers In Chapter 11 Appeals

David Casazza, Elizabeth Kiernan & Addison Bennett

The Supreme Court's holding ensures that insurers who have long been silenced in Chapter 11 proceedings will now be heard. It is also a shot across the bow for two other judge-made, atextual doctrines that bar consideration of the merits in Chapter 11 appeals.

Features

Is Supreme Court the Next Step In Deciding ISP Copyright Infringement Liability? Image

Is Supreme Court the Next Step In Deciding ISP Copyright Infringement Liability?

Jimmy Hoover

A new appeal landed at the U.S. Supreme Court with potentially billions of dollars at stake for the music, movie and Internet industries. The question presented is whether internet service providers such as Cox Communications, AT&T and Comcast should be held liable for the copyright infringement committed by their users.

Features

Supreme Court Unwilling to Rule On Constitutionality of Florida and Texas Social Media Legislation Image

Supreme Court Unwilling to Rule On Constitutionality of Florida and Texas Social Media Legislation

Peter Brown

The court's unwillingness to issue a final decision at this early stage indicates how much is at stake for social media moderation of users' postings. The outcome could set a crucial precedent affecting the regulation of content on social media platforms, influencing how these entities manage user-generated content and exercise their editorial discretion.

Features

The Future Viability of 105(a) Injunctions Following the Supreme Court's Decision In 'Purdue Pharma' Image

The Future Viability of 105(a) Injunctions Following the Supreme Court's Decision In 'Purdue Pharma'

Theresa A. Driscoll

Until now, a successful reorganization assumed the debtor could confirm a plan with nondebtor releases and injunctions based on less than full creditor consensus. Now that nonconsensual releases in Chapter 11 plans are no longer permitted, will debtors have a more difficult time obtaining a 105(a) injunction?

Features

Supreme Court Upholds Names Clause in Trademark Law, Emphasizing Historical and Traditional Foundations Image

Supreme Court Upholds Names Clause in Trademark Law, Emphasizing Historical and Traditional Foundations

Howard J. Shire & Justin Tilghman

In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the Lanham Act's provision that prohibits the registration of trademarks consisting of or comprising the name of a particular living individual without the individual's written consent.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES