Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bit Parts
Consumers' Digital Music Price-Fixing Suit Ruled No “Class” Act
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied class certification in a consumers' suit alleging price-fixing and restraint of trade by record labels in setting the price for digital downloads for music services the labels had formed. In re Digital Music Antitrust Litigation, 06-md-1780. The long-running case, which has been in federal court since 2007, arose out of the major labels' attempts at founding the MusicNet and pressplay download services, with a 70-cent wholesale price, in the pre-Apple iTunes era. Citing the litigation's fourth amended complaint, Senior United States District Judge Loretta A. Preska noted: “All [the label] Defendants signed distribution agreements with MusicNet and pressplay. These joint ventures, along with the Recording Industry Association of America, allowed Defendants to 'maintain[] prices at artificially high levels, eliminate[] competition among the Defendants in the pricing and terms of Internet Music sales, and provide[] one of several forums in which the Defendants could discuss their general desires to restrain trade in Internet Music and come to agreement on the specifics.'” But Senior Judge Preska decided the plaintiffs failed to meet the “typicality” requirement of Rule 23(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that “claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class.” Judge Preska acknowledged: “The Court is well-aware that Plaintiffs have dedicated years of this litigation to adding and withdrawing Proposed Class Representatives in order to find individuals who can both provide proof of music download purchases during the class period and did not engage in illegal downloading.” The court concluded: “Here, large numbers of the proposed class members engaged in illegal downloading of Digital Music and would therefore be subject to counterclaims on the basis of an unclean hands theory, while the Proposed Class Representatives would not. These counterclaims would likely become the focus of the litigation if the Court were to grant Plaintiffs' motion for class certification.”
Marshall Tucker Band's Former Manager Loses Bid for Attorney Fees After Prevailing in Trademark Action Brought Against It By the Band
The U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina declined to award attorney fees and costs to the Marshall Tucker Band's former manager M T Industries (MTI) following dismissal of the band's trademark claims against it. Marshall Tucker Band Inc. v. M T Industries Inc. (MTI), 7:16-00420. MTI had filed a trademark application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for the band's name in digital media. MTI made the bare statement in its application that it had used the band name for that purpose “in commerce.” But in its trademark infringement suit, the band failed to provide evidence of “in commerce” use to support its claims. Earlier this year, District Judge Mary Geiger Lewis dismissed the band's trademark infringement and dilution claims. MTI then moved for attorney fees and costs under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1117, and under Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. District Judge Lewis first recalled: “Here, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss, dismissing Plaintiffs' federal trademark infringement and trademark dilution claims with prejudice. In that those were the only claims establishing independent federal jurisdiction over the action, the Court dismissed without prejudice Plaintiffs' federal trademark cancellation and declaratory judgment claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.” Thus, Judge Lewis ruled, MTI was a “prevailing party” because it “unquestionably received at least 'some relief'” when she dismissed the case. But in denying attorney fees and costs for MTI, the district judge decided the Marshall Tucker Band's lawsuit was neither frivolous nor objectively unreasonable. “Although the Court ultimately determined Plaintiffs' federal trademark infringement and trademark dilution claims to be without merit, the Court is unable to hold it was 'so unreasonable that no reasonable litigant could believe' those claims would succeed,” Judge Lewis wrote. “Furthermore, the fact Plaintiffs could have — and perhaps should have — proceeded before the USPTO fails to meet this frivolous or objectively unreasonable standard as well.” Noting “however unwise” it turned out to be for the band to pursue its claims in court, instead of through the USPTO, Judge Lewis concluded that “it was entirely within their discretion to choose this [judicial] venue.”
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
Fifth Circuit Rejects Majority 'Independent Economic Value' Test for Infringement Damages
Most of the federal circuit courts that have addressed what qualifies either as a "compilation" or as a single creative work apply an "independent economic value" analysis that looks at the market worth of the single creation as of the time when an infringement occurs. But in a recent ruling of first impression, the Fifth Circuit rejected the "independent economic value" test in determining which individual sound recordings are eligible for their own statutory awards and which are part of compilation.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
AI Governance In Practice
Regardless of how a company proceeds with identifying AI governance challenges, and folds appropriate mitigation solution into a risk management framework, it is critical to begin with an AI governance program.