Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
ZBA Did Not Violate Open Meetings Law
Matter of Haverstraw Owners Professionals and Entrepreneurs v. Town of Ramapo Zoning Board of Appeals
NYLJ 6/9/17, p. 27, col. 6
AppDiv, Second Dept.
(memorandum opinion)
In an article 78 proceeding brought by project opponents seeking to invalidate grant of area variances, opponents appealed from Supreme Court's denial of the petition and dismissal of the proceeding. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the zoning board of appeals (ZBA) had not violated the open meetings law.
The ZBA conducted two public hearings on the application for area variances. After the close of the public hearings but before the next ZBA meeting, the ZBA's counsel then prepared a proposed draft written determination. Subsequently, at an Oct. 25, 2012 public meeting, the ZBA considered the draft and granted the variance. Project opponents contended that this process violated the open meetings law because there was no public discussion, deliberation or consideration by the ZBA at the Oct. 25 meeting. Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?