Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Development
Condo May Not Compel ZBA to Respond to Complaint
Matter of Willows Condominium Association v. Town of Greenburgh
NYLJ 8/4/17, p. 27, col. 1
AppDiv, Second Dept.
(memorandum opinion).
In a condominium association's article 78 proceeding to compel the town and the town's building inspector to render a formal determination of allegations that a neighboring nursery was out of compliance with the town zoning code, the association appealed from Supreme Court's dismissal of the proceeding. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the association had not adequately alleged that the town had violated a clear legal right.
The condominium association had sent a letter to the town building inspector alleging that a nearby nursery was illegally manufacturing topsoil and mulch on the premises. The building inspector sent a notice of violation to the nursery, demanding generally that it comply with the local zoning ordinance. The association was not satisfied with this response, and filed an application with the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), seeking review of the building inspector's failure to issue a formal determination of their complaint. When the ZBA declined to consider their application, the association brought this article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus to compel the building inspector to render a formal determination of the association's allegation, and to compel the ZBA to hear the challenge to the building inspector's action. Supreme Court dismissed the petition.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.