Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Almost every business owner loathes worker's compensation insurance — costs are high and can go up significantly in the event of a claim or multiple claims. Also, worker's comp can be a cost center that is heavily impacted by fraud and abuse. If employers can control the number and severity of claims and lower worker's comp costs, they can put the money to better use.
One of the challenges with a worker's comp incident is that time is usually not on the business owner's side. If an employee has a non-emergency workplace injury and follows a normal progression of informing their supervisor and leaving work to seek medical attention, the costs rapidly escalate. Remember, time is not on the employer's friend, and during this process the employee may conclude that his or her injury is worse than it is. This conclusion may be real (caused by a lag in treatment) or perceived. One of the keys to lowering the cost of worker's comp incidents is to significantly shorten the time window from the event to the first conversation with a medical professional.
Through technology, a company can provide rapid response telemedicine which shortens the incidence of the medical response window, distributes all paperwork and lowers the cost of worker's comp claims. Employees with non-emergency injuries talk with a healthcare professional before leaving the workplace. Often, these injuries can be treated without a costly trip to the local Emergency Room or healthcare provider. Also, many injured employees can receive on-going consultation via a virtual clinic or provider. As a result, the cost of worker's comp claims and time out of work are both significantly reduced. On average, a virtual triage program has proven to lower E-MOD scores and decrease workers comp claims and costs by 40%.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.