Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act) was passed by the House and Senate and signed into law by President Trump at the end of 2017. The Act made significant changes to certain Internal Revenue Code (Code) provisions dealing with highly compensated employees. Among these are restrictions (in the form of excise taxes) on compensation of certain highly paid employees of “applicable tax-exempt organizations” (i.e., 501(c) organizations, political organizations, and farmers' cooperatives as well as non-profit healthcare systems, hospitals, credit unions,federal, state, and local governmental entities with excludable income).
Effective for all taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, new Section 4960 imposes an excise tax on applicable tax-exempt organizations where the “remuneration” received by an employee (or former employee) that is one of the five highest compensated employees for any prior taxable year beginning after Dec. 31, 2016 exceeds certain amounts. For this purpose, remuneration includes amounts that become taxable under Section 457(f) upon a lapse of a substantial risk of forfeiture, but excludes amounts paid directly to certain medical professionals for performance of services. Amounts credited under qualified and welfare plans are not included in remuneration. The Section 4960 excise tax equals 21% of the sum of the remuneration exceeding $1M annually. These employers must now comply with the remuneration (compensation and benefits) ceiling for the highest compensated top five employees under §4960 and §162(m). Additionally, once an individual is labeled in that group they will remain in that group so the group may expand and the excise tax is annually applied.
The IRS issued final regulations in June 2016 that provide a roadmap for a successful solution to the excise tax conundrum. A solution applies an actuarially based methodology to provide benefits for selected non-profit executives on a tax-efficient basis. If you already have a plan in place, it is most likely a 457(f) plan for the executive, management and professional employees. This is not meant to replace a plan in existence, rather to compliment it as there are decided differences. Most significant for the participants is the opportunity to provide for their families, a pre-retirement death benefit without risks of forfeiture and with enormous flexibility. This is not an ERISA plan; it does not need a Trustee and the participant and plan sponsor will avoid the claims of creditors while providing for the participant's loved ones. Because this is not a qualified plan and it is not considered deferred compensation by the IRS, the plan can be self-funded and the benefit amounts can vary on a participant-by-participant basis. Because it follows the “top hat” rules, it does not require any form of ongoing or annual filings with any regulatory agencies.
Non-profit organizations have limited opportunities to recruit, retain and reward highly prized executives because of regulatory, economic, human resources, communication and compliance requirements. New rules provided by the IRS offer the opportunity to use a planning tool that will provide a current benefit for the top five executives not otherwise available in the marketplace.
Using the actuarial methodology, the non-profit organization can provide this without requiring additional recordkeeping, reporting, limitation of covered employees, ERISA and qualified plan rules, employee cooperation, regulatory compliance issues and penalties. This §457(e)11 plan provides:
A §457(e)11 plan is a permissibly selective benefit plan. The death benefit only plan uses a multidisciplinary platform following deferred compensation welfare benefit plan structures with an actuarially determined current benefit provided for employees and independent contractors. The participants are taxed on the economic benefit so long as the benefit is funded by the employer. A §457(e)11 plan is a non-qualified ineligible non-deferred compensation and non-compensation plan (26 CFR1.457-11, IRC 457 Examination Guidelines). (Note: See the decision tree explanation for compliance purposes.)
A plan sponsor must be a tax-exempt entity (TEE) (457[e][1]). A participant may be an employee or independent contractor of a TEE §457(e)(2), 1.457-2(d).
A 457(e)(11) death benefit plan does not have to comply with risk of forfeiture or acceleration of income 457(f) requirements. See, IRC §457(f)(11)(A)(1), Notice 87-13 and 88-68.
Payments by the plan sponsor to fund a §457 (e)(11) death benefit plan are not taxable income, nor deferred compensation, to the participant. See, Office of Chief Counsel (OCC) Memorandum No. INFO 2003-0082 (Feb. 25, 2003).
In the memo, the OCC interpreted Notice 88-68 to indicate that the providing or accruing of the benefits is not a taxable event. Providing the benefit thru a §457(e)11 plan does not affect taxation to the participant, that is addressed under other provisions of the law. The participant funded by the benefit is taxed on the Table 2001 rates as economic benefit. As the death benefit is the only benefit provided by participating in the plan, to the extent the benefit qualifies as life insurance under §101(a), it should not be subject to income tax as received by a beneficiary identified in the plan.
The plan may be elective or non-elective, and a salary reduction or non-salary reduction plan (IRS Notice 88-68 and Notice 87-13Q&A 26).
A §457(e)11 death benefit plan may also be funded with life insurance (REG147196-07 06-21-2016).
|The benefit program can be provided to non-profit executives (top hat group) providing services to tax exempt entities. A §457(e)11 DBO plan is deemed a “top hat” plan and is available to management, highly compensated professionals and independent contractors. See, IRS Examination Guidelines 4.72-19.
|The benefits can be funded throughout the accounting period and within 75 days of year-end relating back to previous accounting periods, like similar plans. The commencement date is not tied into the beginning or end of any reporting period, which provides additional flexibility. Notice 87-13 Q-26 indicates “in the case of deferrals, §457 applies to both elective and nonelective deferred compensation amounts. In the case of deferrals that are at the election of the individual, §457 applies without regard to whether the deferral election is made prior to the year during which the employee performs the services to which the deferred amounts relate.”
|While non-profits want to recruit, retain and reward highly prized management, professional and independent contractors, they run on very thin margins. Employers want to fund benefits for selected employees in the most economically efficient fashion. See, Notice 87-13, 1987-1 CB432Q-26. The rules permit the funding by way of salary reduction in whole or in part so the non-profit employer can provide benefits with less financial responsibility than other comparative benefit plans.
The §457(e)11 plan is different from any other plan currently being made available to non-profit plan sponsors as it provides a current welfare benefit to selected highly prized employees. Because of the ability to earmark the “top hat” qualified participants, the plan sponsor can permissibly provide a benefit to them and not provide that same benefit to other employees as a class or in a uniform amount.
|The §457(e)11 death benefit only plan is not a qualified plan nor deferred compensation or an ERISA plan. The DOL has specific administrative rules that requires the following:
The website to enroll is www.askebsa.dol.gov/efile/Home/tophat.
The Plan Administrator will have to electronically enroll the plan at the time of implementation and will provide proof of filing to the plan sponsor.
|At the time of implementation, the 457(e)11 plan should receive validation from an independent third party:
No other benefit plan available to non-profits provides this multidisciplinary tool to recruit, retain and reward the non-profit's highly prized employees and independent contractors. If a non-profit organization is not currently using this planning tool, they are missing out on the opportunities and they may look elsewhere and desert the service provider (your client). This is another leg of the stool to provide executive benefits in the most economically efficient manner while being regulatory compliant.
To hear an interview with the developer of the program, go to http://bit.ly/2yvoXOo.
*****
Lawrence L. Bell, JD, LTM, CLU, ChFC, CFP®, AEP, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, has served as Tax Bar liaison to the IRS for 10 years. He has received patents in actuarial product fields dealing with COLI, GASB, FASB, IASB and OPEB solutions. To learn more, visit www.mycpo.net.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.