Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Seizure of Attorney-Client Communications: Fighting Back

By Ronald H. Levine
July 01, 2018
|

DOJ Guidelines and Regulations

See, e.g., Klitzman, Klitzman & Gallagher v. Krut

  1. They are limited to searches of an attorney's “premises” — a law firm's or in-house attorney's office and files — and arguably it does not apply to searches of other offices or other computers at a business in which legal materials may be located; and
  2. They are limited to searches regarding “subject attorneys,” defined as an attorney who is either: |
    1. a “suspect, subject or target”;
    2. related by blood or marriage to a suspect; or
    3. believed to be in possession of contraband or the fruits or instrumentalities of a crime. U.S.A.M. at §9-13.420. Search warrants for premises of subject attorneys must be approved by the U.S. Attorney after consultation with the Department of Justice. Search warrants regarding attorneys who are not “subject attorneys” but rather “disinterested third parties” require approval by a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. See, 28 C.F.R. §59.4(b)(2) (cited in U.S.A.M. at §§9-19.220-221).

See, e.g

  1. Whether the advance notice provided by a subpoena would likely result in the destruction, alteration, concealment or transfer of the materials sought because the suspect has direct control over, or indirect access to, the materials sought (via friendship with, loyalty to, or sympathy for, the possessor of the materials); and
  2. Whether the immediate seizure of the materials is necessary to prevent injury to persons or property or to preserve their evidentiary value and/or to prevent delay in obtaining the materials, which delay would significantly jeopardize an ongoing investigation or prosecution.

Id See, e.g., Carpenter v. Comm'r., IRS

  1. Review of either all seized materials, or of just those materials thought arguably to be privileged, by a judicial officer or special master;
  2. The provision of a copy of seized materials to the defense attorney; and
  3. Defense attorney input to the court regarding disputes over the seizure of privileged documents.
|

Pushing Back

A person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure of property or by the deprivation of property may move for the property's return …. The court must receive evidence on any factual issue necessary to decide the motion. If it grants the motion, the court must return the property to the movant, but may impose reasonable conditions to protect access to the property and its use in later proceedings.

lawfully See See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoenas in camera In re Fattah United States v. Singleton Id Gmach Shefa Chaim v. United States

  1. Whether the government displayed a callous disregard for the rights of the movant;
  2. Whether the movant has an individual interest in and need for the property he wants returned;
  3. Whether the movant would be irreparably injured by denying return of the property; and
  4. Whether the movant has an adequate remedy at law for the redress of his grievance.

United States v. Singleton accord Klitzman, Klitzman & Gallagher v. Krut aff'd in camera See, e.g., United States v. Jimenez in camera United States v. Sperow |

Conclusion

specifically ***** Ronald H. Levine [email protected]

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

Generative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses Image

GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.