Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinFeaturesLaw Firm Client RelationshipsLitigationWhite Collar Crime

The Seizure of Attorney-Client Communications: Fighting Back

By Ronald H. Levine
July 01, 2018

DOJ Guidelines and Regulations

See, e.g., Klitzman, Klitzman & Gallagher v. Krut
  1. They are limited to searches of an attorney's “premises” — a law firm's or in-house attorney's office and files — and arguably it does not apply to searches of other offices or other computers at a business in which legal materials may be located; and
  2. They are limited to searches regarding “subject attorneys,” defined as an attorney who is either:
    1. a “suspect, subject or target”;
    2. related by blood or marriage to a suspect; or
    3. believed to be in possession of contraband or the fruits or instrumentalities of a crime. U.S.A.M. at §9-13.420. Search warrants for premises of subject attorneys must be approved by the U.S. Attorney after consultation with the Department of Justice. Search warrants regarding attorneys who are not “subject attorneys” but rather “disinterested third parties” require approval by a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. See, 28 C.F.R. §59.4(b)(2) (cited in U.S.A.M. at §§9-19.220-221).
See, e.g
  1. Whether the advance notice provided by a subpoena would likely result in the destruction, alteration, concealment or transfer of the materials sought because the suspect has direct control over, or indirect access to, the materials sought (via friendship with, loyalty to, or sympathy for, the possessor of the materials); and
  2. Whether the immediate seizure of the materials is necessary to prevent injury to persons or property or to preserve their evidentiary value and/or to prevent delay in obtaining the materials, which delay would significantly jeopardize an ongoing investigation or prosecution.
Id See, e.g., Carpenter v. Comm'r., IRS
  1. Review of either all seized materials, or of just those materials thought arguably to be privileged, by a judicial officer or special master;
  2. The provision of a copy of seized materials to the defense attorney; and
  3. Defense attorney input to the court regarding disputes over the seizure of privileged documents.

Pushing Back

A person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure of property or by the deprivation of property may move for the property's return …. The court must receive evidence on any factual issue necessary to decide the motion. If it grants the motion, the court must return the property to the movant, but may impose reasonable conditions to protect access to the property and its use in later proceedings.

lawfully See See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoenas in camera In re Fattah United States v. Singleton Id Gmach Shefa Chaim v. United States
  1. Whether the government displayed a callous disregard for the rights of the movant;
  2. Whether the movant has an individual interest in and need for the property he wants returned;
  3. Whether the movant would be irreparably injured by denying return of the property; and
  4. Whether the movant has an adequate remedy at law for the redress of his grievance.
United States v. Singleton accord Klitzman, Klitzman & Gallagher v. Krut aff'd in camera See, e.g., United States v. Jimenez in camera United States v. Sperow

Conclusion

specifically ***** Ronald H. Levine [email protected]

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.