Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When the two largest rivals in an industry combine, it is typically a sign of a mature market. In the case of litigation finance, throw that rule out. The December 2016 acquisition of Gerchen Keller Capital by Burford Capital — at the time the two largest companies investing in commercial litigation — has proved to be a spark plug for the nascent business of financially backing lawsuits.
Before it was acquired, Chicago-based Gerchen Keller boasted to be the world's largest litigation financier, having raised $1.3 billion. In the 18 months since its sale, major funders in the U.S. have announced raising $1.75 billion to put toward new cases. That is more than three times the amount raised in the 18 months prior to Burford's acquisition. Eight different funds or debt issuances have raised more than $100 million since GKC's sale; there were just three capital raises of that size in the prior three years.
Longford Capital exemplifies the growth of investors' appetites in litigation finance in the U.S. Started by two former partners of a Chicago-based, 100-lawyer firm, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, Longford launched a fund with $56.5 million in 2014. In September 2017, it coaxed nearly nine times that amount from investors, announcing that its second fund had closed at $500 million. The firm now estimates there is up to $5 billion in capital committed to commercial litigation finance in the U.S., and up to 30 money managers operating in the space.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.