Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Disney Enterprises has been handed a setback in an ill-conceived lawsuit: Going after people who dress up as Disney-owned characters like Elsa from Frozen or Chewbacca from Star Wars to perform at children's birthday parties.
Federal District Judge George Daniels of the Southern District of New York tossed claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin brought by Disney and its affiliates Marvel Characters and Lucasfilm against Characters for Hire (CFH). However, in his summary judgment decision District Judge Daniels kept alive Disney's trademark dilution and copyright infringement allegations.
New York-based Characters for Hire provides “costumed entertainment” for birthday parties and corporate events in major cities across the country. The characters aren't outright copycats. As the company states on its website: “It is not our intention to violate any copyright laws. The characters that we offer are NOT name brand copyrighted characters. … Any resemblance to nationally known copyrighted characters is strictly coincidental.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Chief information officers still bear the brunt of cybersecurity worries at many companies. But a study by the Association of Corporate Counsel Foundation finds that chief legal officers are increasingly taking a leadership role in cybersecurity strategy.
General counsel are eager to tap the promise of generative AI. But without clear technology road maps, many legal departments are struggling to turn that interest into action.
Part Two of this two-part article examines practical steps marketers must take to succeed in this changing landscape by embracing a multichannel, AI-driven approach to their marketing and PR efforts.
When the SEC issues the next annual enforcement report for fiscal year 2025, we expect securities offering actions and investment adviser actions will almost certainly be up, and the “crypto” and “cyber” cases will almost certainly be down. Public statements by the new SEC administration have said as much, but even more telling than public statements are the allocation of limited enforcement resources.
The VPPA may be nearly four-decades old and video-rental stores largely a thing of the past, but the rise of online content, streaming services and ancillary activities has brought with it frequent litigation based on the VPPA. The key challenge in these litigations is how to interpret the VPPA’s 1980s terms in light of today’s digital advances.