Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
We constantly hear from clients that they want us to know their business and anticipate their needs, to help them to see around corners. We hear about the ongoing cost pressures clients face, which force in-house counsel to do more with less, and the pressures on outside counsel to provide greater efficiencies and cost predictability. We also hear that clients hate to be cross-sold. However, this does not mean that clients are not interested to be introduced to new colleagues who can provide insight. Rather, cross selling must be thoughtful and tailored to clients' needs — a concept many of you will recognize from Heidi Gardner's work and the success to be gained from Smart Collaboration strategies.
Law firms are listening and implementing strategies to better understand clients and their varied needs. In addition to adopting new technologies to increase efficiency and provide transparency, law firms are increasing their investment in business development and competitive intelligence. In a recent study, Acritas and The Tilt Institute found that law firms with highly effective competitive intelligence (CI) functions perform better than their peers over time. The study also showed that, while more than 80% of law firms had resources dedicated to CI, only 52% had a dedicated, formal function. To me, that says demand is outweighing supply.
What does it mean to build a CI culture at your firm? As I frequently say, intelligence comes when external market data is analyzed and combined with internal law firm knowledge. Without negating the skills CI professionals bring to their roles, there are tools and resources available to lawyers that they can use to create their own intelligence.
External Tools: Today, many lawyers are well acquainted with resources such as Westlaw and LexisNexis and want to be in control of their own research methods. Vendors such as these provide regular training to lawyers on how to use their services. Going through the process of doing their own research can be beneficial to lawyers in a number of ways:
Internal Tools: Firms are at different stages of sophistication in connection with developing and using internal tools, though all firms have some sort of internal information available to lawyers. Firms are also implementing collaboration tools to facilitate knowledge sharing within and across practice groups and offices. Encouraging lawyers to seek out those internal tools and the information therein, and combining that with the data found on external tools, is where the cultural change happens.
Seeking out key client relationships, engaging in client feedback programs, being involved with client development strategies, identifying a legal service client is in need of, etc. are steps lawyers can take to become more valuable to their clients. When lawyers introduce colleagues to clients with a specific purpose in mind, it will eliminate the client feeling like they are being 'cross-sold' to for no good reason. All of this combines to create a culture of intelligence — what can I learn about my client and how can I use this to build insight?
As firms strive to differentiate themselves and invest more resources in doing so, it's only natural that CI requests will continue to increase. Embrace the ability to create a culture of intelligence, promote end-user tools, and heighten awareness of clean internal data and the benefits to be gained from contributing to data collection efforts.
Introduce your clients to colleagues that can help them. There's no need for you to go it alone and to try to be all things to all people. It's not possible, and it's not practical. Educate your clients to do what they can on their own and consult with you when they understand where you can add value. Create a visible firm presence and get involved in projects where you can make a meaningful contribution. Remind yourself that people usually ask you for what they think you can get for them, not necessarily what they really want. Showcase your skills and let people know what you can do.
*****
Patricia Ellard is a competitive intelligence professional, with more than 20 years of experience in a top-three global management consulting firm and in global law firms.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.