Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Law Firm Mergers and the Economic Outlook for 2019
As law firms endeavor to survive in an increasingly competitive world, one strategy picking up steam is the law firm merger. 2018 was a banner year for mergers as firms moved at a rapid pace to complete more acquisitions than in years prior. Some advisers point to the challenges that small law firms are currently facing amid all of the changes in traditional ways of practicing law, such as automation of many legal services and downward fee pressure as reasons for the uptick in M&A activity. Artificial intelligence, for example, is making an impact in law firms as this new technology is reducing the need for hundreds, or in some cases, thousands of hours that would otherwise be spent by young attorneys performing document review tasks.
Clients simply would prefer that this new technology perform such repetitive tasks as opposed to a team of attorneys doing things the old fashioned, and of course, more costly way. In this article, we recap law firm merger activity in 2018 and consider the economic outlook for law firm mergers for 2019.
2018 In Review
Law firms completed a record 106 mergers during 2018, according to Altman Weil, Inc. The 106 mergers represented an increase of five mergers from the previous year, and 33 mergers above the average of 73 transactions that have taken place over the prior ten year period. Some law firms merged to get a foothold into a new geographic area. Of the 106 mergers, 57 involved law firms acquiring practices located outside of their home state. Fourteen of such transactions consisted of acquisitions of firms situated outside of the United States. New York City, home to one the world's most high profile financial services sector was the geographic market most targeted in 2018 with eight firms from the Big Apple being acquired last year.
Most of the firms acquired had between six to 20 partners. The largest merger of 2018 was the combination of Bryan Cave LLP and UK-based Berwin Leighton Paisner, resulting in a combined law firm of over 1,600 attorneys. The two firms sought to obtain a competitive advantage in the global marketplace through the combination of each other's resources, which resulted in an expanded presence and set of service offerings around the globe.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.