Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sales is a challenge for every business, but it's a subject many lawyers still tippy toe around — even as more firms focus on improving business fundamentals.
It's not just semantics. Lawyers are one of only a handful of professionals whose job requires them both to do the work and generate the business.
This “Doer-Seller” Dilemma is particularly vexing for lawyers because of a long-held belief that sales is somehow beneath the legal profession and because lawyers have a limited view of what successful selling looks like.
As a result, many firms rely on a handful of partners to drive most of the revenue, which is not only risky, it makes sustainable growth extraordinarily difficult.
The good news is that when sales is reframed as an act of service that elevates the “seller” side of the doer-seller equation, lawyers will start to see that sales is simply as an extension of what they do best.
In most firms, there is a one-size-fits-all profile of a “rainmaker,” when in fact recent research of doer-sellers demonstrates that, just as there are different types of lawyers, there are multiple profiles of doer-sellers. (This research was conducted using the GrowthPlay Chally Assessment, a 45-year-old talent-profiling tool that has been used on more than 750,000 people to measure skills and motivations attributed to success in high-performing organizations. With its roots in the U.S. Department of Justice — the assessment was originally designed to help predict success of FBI candidates — the assessment has statistically validated about 140 measurable performance-affiliated competencies and motivations. More than 500 attorneys were part of the initial doer-seller study, which matched attorney competencies to descriptive profiles based on a combination of the Chally competencies.) Leveraging talent analytics, the research compared competencies based on five “doer-seller” profiles:
And while it is true that natural-born rainmakers are a rare breed, the research provides two important insights. It reinforces with data that every lawyer has natural selling skills. In fact, 98% of the attorneys that were part of the study tested as a “fit” for at least one of the five profiles below.
And, it provides a tool for helping to match lawyers to the types of sales activities that enable them to work to their strengths.
Firm cultures that perpetuate a view that selling is manipulative and self-serving will be hard-pressed to find lawyers who embrace it. But when the definition of sales is reframed as an extension of what comes naturally to lawyers — solving problems in service to others — it changes the way lawyers look at selling and allows them to embrace the act of sales as something that is authentic to who they are and the work they do.
Consider how many of the skills that go into being a great lawyer are the same skills that go into being a great seller:
Firms that recognize the potential for creating more consistent revenue by increasing the number of sellers inside their organization can start with the following:
By seeking incremental improvements in sales effectiveness across the partnership, firms can not only achieve greater financial results, they can eliminate the risks that come with relying on too few people to drive growth.
*****
Debra Baker is a managing director at GrowthPlay where she works with lawyers and leadership teams to improve business development performance.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.