Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The next generation of elite law firms may have little in common with today's leading global providers of legal services. Whereas historically top-performing law firms combine stellar talent with marquee clients, brand reputation and client-focused excellence to rise to the top, future leading law firms are equally likely to rise to power using a distinctly different recipe: namely, a mixture of market savvy, strategic agility and operational effectiveness powered by data.
The notion of harnessing the power of data is not a new one. Pundits across sectors have been touting the utility of big data and artificial intelligence for more than a decade. Yet few companies — in any industry — have been able to truly transform data into competitive advantage. The primary obstacle? A noteworthy 93% of companies reported people and process are standing in their way, according to a NewVantage survey of C-suite executives as reported in Harvard Business Review.
These results are not especially surprising. Getting people to think and act differently is a daunting task. The wealth of available data has grown exponentially in the past decade. People's abilities to synthesize and apply data, however, has not. (Prompting a McKinsey Global Institute report to denote this analytical capability as growing in value as the value of data declines.) This dynamic is especially true in law firms. Lawyers themselves, though analytical, are rarely trained in how to interpret and apply data to the business of law. Trained analysts, even in Big Law, are rarer than the elusive tax-paying billionaire. Compound this absence of analytical capabilities with historically hierarchical structures, a shortage of business acumen and cultures where years of experience outweighs almost any other factor (including data) and most law firms are, decidedly, the antithesis of data-driven organizations.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.