Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Mattern has tracked law firm cost recovery strategies — and their success or failure — since 2004. One area of recovery that has seen tremendous growth over the years — and in which it was also apparent that firms were struggling to manage — involved e-discovery services. With big data and the resulting explosion of electronic documents, texts, images and voicemails that are subject to discovery, the cost burden was increasing at a pace that required firms to reconsider their recovery approach.
This is why in 2019, Mattern went to the market to conduct its first deep dive into e-discovery and litigation support cost recovery in the 2020 e-Discovery and Litigation Support Cost Recovery Survey (Survey). Some of the results surprised us.
Some of the unsurprising Survey results included the fact that over 80% of firms reported electronically stored information (ESI) involved in discovery was on the rise. Mattern also suspected the more advanced activities, especially those typically scrutinized by opposing counsel, would largely end up vended to third party providers. This certainly proved to be the case for forensics data collection, where virtually all firms reported shifting this activity to organizations that specialize in this field. Mattern supports the decision most firms have adopted in this area; this is one of our core recommendations in an effort to avoid spoliation and scrutiny risks.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.