Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Whether a law firm has been around for a decade or a century, it's invariably used that time to build up some sort of reputation. Buyers of legal services and peers in the market have some sense of what to expect when they encounter, say, Jones Day or Baker McKenzie, both perennial winners in consultancy Acritas' ranking of law firm brands.
But buyers have a broader slate of options in 2020 than ever before, whether that means handling more work in-house, hiring temporary lawyers during a crunch, or turning to a recently launched "alternative provider" to address the massive pile of contracts they need to manage.
One response for firms is to simply cede that work and double down on "high-value" tasks — their traditional bread and butter. Many already followed this strategy when shedding their own e-discovery capabilities and turning to outside providers. But as competition among firms increases, a commitment to core services alone offers no guarantee of growth. The alternative approach — expanding into new ways of delivering legal services — carries its own risks.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.