Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
During a time when online marketing, virtual shopping and electronic communication are more widely used than ever, it is critically important for entertainment industry businesses to be highly aware of how they are using trademarks, the scope of a trademark owner's rights and the consequences of infringing them. Parties utilizing trademarks to market and sell their goods or services should be careful not to infringe on an existing trademark, else they be subject to monetary consequences in addition to equitable remedies like an injunction. And for many, the amount of recoverable damages at stake is a primary driver to strategic decisions regarding when to initiate, defend or settle litigation.
Federal trademark infringement is governed by the Lanham Act. Under that statute, a trademark owner may recover three broad categories of monetary damages: actual damages, disgorgement of the defendant's profits, and attorney fees and costs. See, 15 U.S.C. §1117(a). Each category of damages subject to recovery is discussed below, along with strategies for both plaintiffs and defendants to consider.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.