Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
During a time when online marketing, virtual shopping and electronic communication are more widely used than ever, it is critically important for entertainment industry businesses to be highly aware of how they are using trademarks, the scope of a trademark owner's rights and the consequences of infringing them. Parties utilizing trademarks to market and sell their goods or services should be careful not to infringe on an existing trademark, else they be subject to monetary consequences in addition to equitable remedies like an injunction. And for many, the amount of recoverable damages at stake is a primary driver to strategic decisions regarding when to initiate, defend or settle litigation.
Federal trademark infringement is governed by the Lanham Act. Under that statute, a trademark owner may recover three broad categories of monetary damages: actual damages, disgorgement of the defendant's profits, and attorney fees and costs. See, 15 U.S.C. §1117(a). Each category of damages subject to recovery is discussed below, along with strategies for both plaintiffs and defendants to consider.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.