Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As alternative legal service providers (ALSPs) continue to take root with significant growth across the legal world, law firms have to consider how these niche companies affect their bottom line and how to react to this burgeoning parallel industry.
According to the American Bar Association, ALSPs are among the top competitors pulling work from law firms, noting that they are better leveraged and priced more competitively. With a growth rate of 50% annually, ALSPs aren't going away soon. And while law firms are typically slow to implement change, many are toying with ways to minimize the financial effects of ALSPs, both by creating subsidiaries and by contracting with outside providers. The goal is to compete, increase efficiency and better serve clients.
During this era of COVID-19, streamlined processes and enhanced client service are more important to the bottom line than ever. As a result, law firms have taken a significant turn to ALSPs, which have seen strong uptick in growth as standalone service providers and as law firm subcontractors. Law firms are using ALSPs to trim budgets and free up attorneys to address higher-level issues, all the while improving the client experience.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.