Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent UK High Court ruling in The Financial Reporting Council Ltd v Frasers Group plc, [2020] EWHC 2607 (Ch), has provided lawyers everywhere with a stark reminder on the scope of privilege for electronic communications: just because an email itself is privileged does not automatically render the documents attached to that email privileged. In other words, despite carefully worded disclaimers and self-proclamations of privilege, if any attorney-client communication or its attachment(s) are shared beyond the initial or intended scope, privilege may be broken.
While this single court decision may be somewhat limited in scope, it highlights longstanding problems with lawyers using email to conduct communications and share confidential documents. Once a lawyer hits send, he or she loses control of the sensitive material the email contains. Some newer messaging platforms widely used in the business world, such as Slack, for example, allow for even more multi-directional conversations as well as the easy sharing of documents, further compounding the challenge of maintaining confidentiality and managing privilege.
But technology itself is not the problem. Rather, the issue is that most in-house legal departments and law firms are not currently using the tools they actually need: sophisticated systems designed for legal work that allow lawyers to better manage permissions and access controls in ways that protect privilege while still enabling timely communication. Some forward-thinking corporate legal departments and law firms have embraced these platforms, but many others either aren't aware they exist or continue to struggle with an overall resistance to using new technology. The pitfalls of email are not going away, however, and lawyers have a professional responsibility to find better solutions for their clients. It's time to realize the benefits of legal tech.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.