Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Best Practices for Investigations In Remote Environments
The landscape of corporate investigations has changed dramatically in the last year. New regulations, new market pressures, new data sources and more challenging working conditions have placed organizations under tremendous pressure. Almost overnight, with the COVID-19 pandemic, the entire investigations workflow had to shift to remote environments, with courts or regulators offering little pause for organizations to catch up to the changes. Now, with regulatory and investigations activity expected to pick up significantly in the coming year—more than two-thirds of corporations surveyed have significantly increased budget allocation for investigations work — it's more important than ever to tighten up remote investigations methods to meet best practices.
Aside from enabling continuity during COVID-19 restrictions, remote workflows offer a number of benefits in investigations. A standardized, smooth approach to enable remote investigations will help avoid an accumulation of backlogged matters and help legal and compliance teams remain in good standing with regulators, as well as help keep their organizations compliant. Remote workflows eliminate the costs and delays involved with travel and scheduling numerous in-person meetings and interviews. Technology can now enable sophisticated features for remote interviews, document sharing, record keeping, privacy, security and other key elements of an investigation that make the entire process highly efficient.
For example, in one investigation spurred by two separate whistleblower complaints relating to accounting improprieties and other allegations, the team had less than two weeks to assess the claims in order to meet year-end reporting requirements. Nearly a dozen interviews among individuals across the U.S. and Canada were needed. In-person workflows would have required travel and the involvement of a large team of lawyers and investigators. Using video-enabled technologies, a single team comprised of in-house counsel, outside counsel and third-party investigators conducted all of the interviews over a two-day period and quickly completed their investigation.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.