Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Registered Nurses In a Top Hat Plan
As the healthcare industry is emerging from the pandemic they are looking for ways to reward, retain and recruit a very important segment of its people — Registered Nurses. As an alternative to deferred compensation, employers are looking for ways to provide current benefit in an economically efficient fashion that does not create an immediate and punitive tax on the participant. The proposed increase in taxes also is a consideration in the tools available to employers.
Recent government pronouncements have also provided a bright-line test to provide a permissibly selective alternative to deferred compensation with minimal impact to the participants.
A Bona Fide Death Benefit Plan as described in §409A(d)1 and §457(e) 11 is deemed a "top hat" plan for DOL e filing. While these programs are not considered deferred compensation (OCC INFO 2003-0082), we want to be assured that all applicable rules are followed. A Bona Fide Death Benefit plan is available solely to management or highly compensated professionals and independent contractors. IRS Examination Guidelines 4.72-19. IRC 457 Examination Guidelines (Top Hat Plan) Nonqualified deferred compensation plans are intended to be exempt from the substantive provisions of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (Pub. L. 93-406, 88 Stat. 829, enacted Sept. 2, 1974, codified in part at 29 U.S.C. Ch. 18). The most commonly used exemption from ERISA for nonqualified plans is a top hat plan exemption. A top hat plan is defined in Sections 201(2) of Part 2, 301(a)(3) of Part 3, and 401(a)(1) of Part 4 of Title I of ERISA as an "unfunded" plan that is "maintained by an employer primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees." If a plan satisfies this definition, the plan is exempt from the participation, vesting, funding and fiduciary responsibility rules of ERISA. A top hat plan is subject only to Part 1 of Title I of ERISA, the reporting and disclosure rules, which are satisfied by filing a registration statement with the Department of Labor. The guidance issued by the Department of Labor, the Department of Treasury, and the courts suggests that the eligibility requirements for participation in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that is intended to satisfy the definition of a top hat plan should be narrowly applied so that the number of employees who are eligible to participate is limited to a "select group" of high-level employees whose average compensation is significantly greater than the average compensation of all other employees. The guidance regarding eligibility to participate in a top hat plan issued by the Department of Labor is limited. In DOL Advisory Opinion 90-14A (May 8, 1990), the Department stated:
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.