Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the 2015 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Reed v. The Town of Gilbert, 135 S.Ct. 2218 (2015), the Court applied strict scrutiny to a sign regulation, as it related to directional signs placed by a local congregation that held services at different locations each week. In April, 2022 the Court took another look at the issue of strict scrutiny relating to "off-premises" signs. In the case of City of Austin, Texas v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC, No. 20-1029 (2022), in distinguishing the determination in Reed v. The Town of Gilbert, the majority concluded, in an opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, that strict scrutiny should not apply to determining whether the off-premises sign regulations at issue violated the First Amendment.
The City of Austin regulates signs and specifically regulates signs that are not located at the premises they advertise. The sign code of the City prohibits new off premises signs. Any such signs existing at the time of enactment of the restrictions may remain, may change their message (the face) but may not be changed in any way that increases their nonconformity. It was these provisions which gave rise to the dispute, when Reagan National Advertising sought to digitize off premises signs. There are no similar restrictions on signs that advertise activities located on the premises where the signs are located.
As the Court noted in the City of Austin case, "[o]n-/off-premises distinctions, like the one at issue here, proliferated following the enactment of the Highway Beautification Act of 1965 (Act), 23 U.S.C. §131. In the Act, Congress directed States receiving federal highway funding to regulate outdoor signs in proximity to federal highways, in part by limiting off-premises signs…. The City represents, and respondents have not disputed, that 'tens of thousands of municipalities nationwide' have adopted analogous on-/off-premises distinctions in their sign codes."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.