Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Current Economic Climate Likely to Cause Law Firms to Offer Flexible and Creative Fee Arrangements

By Nicole R. Rekant and Stevan J. Pardo
July 01, 2022

The current economic climate will incline lawyers, specifically litigators, to rethink their fee structures. With inflation at a 40-year high, residential and commercial rents rising, and a predicted looming recession, clients are tightening their budgets, but also demanding the same level of service and results from their attorneys.

Law firms have long offered alternatives to the traditional hourly billing framework, such as monthly retainers and flat fees, predominantly in the areas of real estate and corporate transactions. For litigators, taking certain cases on contingency, such as personal injury also is a norm. But flat fee and contingency compensation arrangements are challenging for trial attorneys because the time lawyers spent litigating a case can be unpredictable. Similarly, the size of a damages claim often is not quantifiable. This is especially true in areas such as construction defects litigation, where developing discovery and experts drive the numbers, and in class actions, where acquiring class action status is uncertain.

Despite a litigator's need to navigate these tricky judgment calls when determining whether to accept a lawsuit on a contingency, client requests for contingency arrangements in litigation likely will increase. One way that litigators can offset the risk is to build in a more sizeable reward from the opposing side by seeking a multiplier if they are the prevailing party.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.