Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The current economic climate will incline lawyers, specifically litigators, to rethink their fee structures. With inflation at a 40-year high, residential and commercial rents rising, and a predicted looming recession, clients are tightening their budgets, but also demanding the same level of service and results from their attorneys.
Law firms have long offered alternatives to the traditional hourly billing framework, such as monthly retainers and flat fees, predominantly in the areas of real estate and corporate transactions. For litigators, taking certain cases on contingency, such as personal injury also is a norm. But flat fee and contingency compensation arrangements are challenging for trial attorneys because the time lawyers spent litigating a case can be unpredictable. Similarly, the size of a damages claim often is not quantifiable. This is especially true in areas such as construction defects litigation, where developing discovery and experts drive the numbers, and in class actions, where acquiring class action status is uncertain.
Despite a litigator's need to navigate these tricky judgment calls when determining whether to accept a lawsuit on a contingency, client requests for contingency arrangements in litigation likely will increase. One way that litigators can offset the risk is to build in a more sizeable reward from the opposing side by seeking a multiplier if they are the prevailing party.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.