Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The relationship between in-house corporate counsel and outside law firm counsel is undergoing significant changes in today's environment. When companies were faced with lawsuits and investigations in the past, they relied on law firms to manage many aspects of their cases. In-house counsel had their own jobs to do and law firm attorneys possessed the knowledge and expertise to focus on discovery, trial preparation and litigation. In-house counsel worked closely with their law firm counterparts throughout the matter, but for the most part corporate attorneys allowed outside counsel to take the lead on the management of individual matters and paid the bills that were submitted. While legal departments may have grumbled over fees, they often accepted the billable hours and trusted the processes of outside counsel.
This "norm" is changing, even as in-house counsel still regularly seek assistance from law firm counsel. Today's in-house counsel are looking at billable hours more carefully and taking more control of their own data. At the same time, they are seeking more collaborative relationships with their law firm attorneys. The new focus on collaboration is based on several factors, including increased pressure on in-house legal departments to manage costs and higher performance expectations. According to the 2021 Association of Corporate Counsel Chief Legal Officers Survey, delivering value and maximizing profits were the top two priorities of CLOs for the next five years.
The evolution of legal technology and processes has dramatically altered the landscape. Thanks to today's powerful tools incorporating advanced technologies like data analytics and artificial intelligence, in-house counsel and their law firm partners can save time, achieve better outcomes, minimize risk, and increase collaboration, all while requiring fewer billable hours.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.