Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
How Energy Drink's "Purple Rain" Trademark Application Was Rejected
At the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), the trademark examining attorneys and administrative judges of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) are tasked with reviewing trademark applications to ensure that they are in good form and that the applied-for mark is eligible for federal trademark registration. Examiners and judges are guided in their review by several policies including the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1051 et seq., the federal statute governing trademark law in the United States and the USPTO's trademark rules of practice and trademark manual of examining procedure or TMEP, among others.
The TMEP is a publicly available document that serves as an excellent resource for actual and potential trademark applicants, registrants and their attorneys. It is accessible online and easily searchable. The TMEP incorporates the Lanham Act and identifies all important application details, including what must be included in an original or renewal application, who is entitled to register a mark and whether they must be represented by an attorney, and what kind of mark is eligible for federal trademark registration versus what kind of mark is prohibited.
Yet, there are still a large number of applications that the examiners and judges must reject because the application does not conform to one or more conditions set forth in the Lanham Act or TMEP. While some of these rejections are considered informalities and usually easily overcome, such as a missing state of incorporation or an overbroad identification of goods, other rejections are substantive and more difficult to navigate.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.