Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Marketing the Law Firm Is Going Digital Only. Here's What You Need to Know.
In evolving with both global trends toward paperless solutions across all media and industries and in shifting with the preferences of our readers, we have decided to wind down print production as part of the ALM digital initiative.
The final print edition of all Law Journal Newsletters titles will be our January issues. Moving forward, you will receive your subscription via an e-newsletter delivered to your inbox. Everything you previously received in print, plus more, can be found online, including:
- A downloadable PDF
- Access to archived versions
- Search functionality for navigation to specific content
- Plus, continuous enhancements for the digital experience
We've witnessed remarkable transformations over two decades of LJN's journey. Our commitment to excellence has remained steadfast, from proofing on blue lines to adopting full digital layouts. While we cherish the legacy of print, we're thrilled to unveil an exciting transition to digital-only. The overwhelming trend reveals user- preferences for online consumption, aligning perfectly with our dedication to enhancing accessibility. This shift optimizes user experience and mirrors the wider trends observed across ALM.
LJN will continue to deliver in-depth analysis and commentary from experts on the latest trends, cases, regulations, and other developments. Our digital shift gives us the freedom to expand our content and we are now poised to offer additional comprehensive coverage.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.