Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
From Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison moving to a closed compensation system to Cravath, Swaine & Moore abandoning a pure lockstep model and hiring nonequity partners, elite law firms are implementing a variety of changes to their pay systems.
No matter the approach, firms appear to have a common goal in mind when making such changes: widening the ratio in pay for the highest and lowest-paid partners in order to better recruit and retain high performers. In the last 20 years, the partner pay ratio has grown from 3:1 to at least 8:1 at firms that have shown the most success, said management consultant Kent Zimmermann, a partner at Zeughauser Group.
"When you look at the firms that have broken through in most competitive practices and cities, like M&A and private equity in New York, the competitors that are breaking through and over time becoming greater market leaders in those competitive areas tend to have rising ratios," Zimmermann said.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?