Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Law firms commonly rely on contract attorneys to assist with a large project for a single matter or collective overflow from multiple matters. These arrangements help the law firm meet client obligations without hiring a new full-time attorney, who may not be needed once the large project concludes or the overflow subsides. While using contract attorneys to address staffing needs is common and routine, it is not a risk-free arrangement.
Here are some tips to help law firms minimize potential risks when working with contract attorneys.
Evaluating and addressing conflict of interest issues may be straightforward when the law firm hires a contract attorney as an employee who works exclusively for a single law firm. In general, the rules of professional conduct applicable to any attorney in the firm, such as the imputation of conflicts of interest, will typically apply to a contract attorney who is retained to work exclusively (albeit temporarily) for the firm.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?