Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the past, when up-and-coming young lawyers and lateral candidates were invited or recruited to join a law partnership, they often gave little thought to whether the required capital contribution was a good investment. Partners made a lot of money. The rising stars wanted in. Most of the time they assumed that accepting responsibility for the firm's debts, obligations, and liabilities — even signing personal guarantees — would be a good idea.
Today, at most big firms, these assumptions are likely correct. But at small and midsized law firms, this is not always the case. Senior associates, non-equity partners and lateral candidates are well aware of the spectacular implosions of storied firms, and the disasters that followed for their capital partners (including, even at large firms, clawbacks by bankruptcy trustees from partners who had resigned years before). Many want to know whether the firm is well-positioned financially to grow and prosper when the current generation of senior partners retires. To get the information they need to value an investment in the firm, they turn to its finance professional (such as its CFO, Controller, or other financial manager).
A law firm's chief finance professional is its repository of all things financial. This executive should be ready to answer three important due diligence questions from prospective new partners about succession:
These are "canary in the coalmine" questions. If the finance chief cannot produce satisfactory responses, it may be time to tell firm management that inadequate succession planning is inhibiting the firm's ability to attract new partners — and therefore inhibiting growth.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.