Supreme Court’s Rejection of Purdue Pharma Settlement Redefines Releases In Chapter 11

Read These Next

• 

  Appellate Courts Skeptical About Bankruptcy Court Sanctions

  By Michael L. Cook

  Recent appellate decisions reflect a distaste for appeals from bankruptcy court sanction orders. A split Fourth Circuit even refused to hear such an appeal. Other courts tend to limit sanctions or, alternatively, accept a bankruptcy judge’s findings under a stringent “abuse of discretion” standard.

  Read More ›

• 

  Ninth Circuit: Debt In Asset Case Is Nondischargeable If Debtor Fails to Properly Schedule the Debt

  By Lawrence J. Kotler and Geoffrey A. Heaton

  In a recent published decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed a previously unresolved question in that circuit: whether a debtor’s failure to properly schedule a debt in an “asset case” renders the debt nondischargeable.

  Read More ›

• 

  Is the Rule Preventing Bankruptcy Judges from Appointing Special Masters Outdated?

  By Mark B. Conlan and Noel L. Hillman

  Rule 9031 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure prevents all bankruptcy judges, and, if broadly interpreted, any federal judge hearing bankruptcy cases and proceedings, from appointing special masters. The rule has not been amended since its adoption in 1983. It is outdated and should be repealed or amended to accord with the reality of today’s complex Chapter 11 cases.

  Read More ›

• 

  Fourth Circuit Could Decide Fate of the ‘Texas Two-Step’

  By Amanda Bronstad

  An influential appellate court has agreed to take up a bankruptcy involving the controversial “Texas two-step,” potentially deciding the merger tactic’s fate in future Chapter 11 cases. The Fourth Circuit agreed to hear a petition to dismiss the bankruptcy of Bestwall, a subsidiary of Koch Industries-owned Georgia-Pacific, created through a “Texas two-step” to resolve 60,000 lawsuits over asbestos exposure.

  Read More ›