Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
U.S. Senator Bob Menendez's trial for bribery, fraud and corruption-related offenses could become yet another opportunity for the U.S. Supreme Court to further narrow federal anti‑corruption law. Indeed, in the past decade, each time the Supreme Court has taken certiorari in a public corruption case, the court has reversed trial convictions and limited the types of conduct that constitute a federal bribery offense.
This trend started with the court's unanimous decision in McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. 550 (2016). Bob McDonnell, the former governor of Virginia, accepted $175,000 in benefits from an executive officer of a nutritional supplement researching company. The company's motive in giving this money to McDonnell was to encourage him to set up a meeting with decision makers at the University of Virginia, a public university, to convince the University to approve research related to its supplement. McDonnell was charged and convicted of honest services fraud and extortion under color of official right under 18 U.S.C. §§1349 and 1951, respectively.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.