Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
U.S. Senator Bob Menendez's trial for bribery, fraud and corruption-related offenses could become yet another opportunity for the U.S. Supreme Court to further narrow federal anti‑corruption law. Indeed, in the past decade, each time the Supreme Court has taken certiorari in a public corruption case, the court has reversed trial convictions and limited the types of conduct that constitute a federal bribery offense.
This trend started with the court's unanimous decision in McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. 550 (2016). Bob McDonnell, the former governor of Virginia, accepted $175,000 in benefits from an executive officer of a nutritional supplement researching company. The company's motive in giving this money to McDonnell was to encourage him to set up a meeting with decision makers at the University of Virginia, a public university, to convince the University to approve research related to its supplement. McDonnell was charged and convicted of honest services fraud and extortion under color of official right under 18 U.S.C. §§1349 and 1951, respectively.
The issue on appeal was the district court's jury charge, which defined the term "official act" to encompass "acts that a public official customarily performs," including acts "in furtherance of longer-term goals" or "in a series of steps to exercise or influence or achieve an end."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.