Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to review a $43 million trademark infringement award in the case of Dewberry Group Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. has sparked significant interest and debate within the legal community. This case, which centers on the interpretation of "principles of equity" under the Lanham Act, has potential ramifications that extend far beyond the realm of trademark law.
Background
The conflict between Dewberry Group and Dewberry Engineers dates to 2006 when Dewberry Capital Corp. (now Dewberry Group) sent a cease-and-desist letter to Dewberry Engineers over the use of the "Dewberry" name. Dewberry Engineers, which had been operating under the Dewberry trademarks since the 1950s, sued Dewberry Capital. The parties reached a settlement in 2007, which included specific terms regarding the use of the Dewberry name and logo in overlapping markets.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.