Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An impact fee is a one-time payment levied onto a property developer by a local government meant to offset the new development's impact on public infrastructure. Impact fees frequently seen include water, wastewater, stormwater, roads, mobility, parks and recreation, public safety, library facilities, public art, public administration buildings and facilities, schools, inclusionary housing, and other in-lieu-of-fees. For many years, these impact fee programs — even ones based on poor methodologies — often went largely unchallenged.
The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, No. 22–1074 (April 12, 2024), has empowered developers and property owners to challenge excessive or unjustified impact fees as unconstitutional and potentially seek damages and attorney fees. This in turn will cause many local governments to revisit the defensibility of their impact fee regimes.
In Sheetz, the plaintiff, George Sheetz, wanted to build a modest home in a quiet El Dorado, California neighborhood, on his residential parcel of land. However, the county required him to pay a $23,420 traffic impact fee to obtain relevant construction permits. Sheetz challenged this fee as an unlawful "exaction" of money under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits the government from taking private property without just compensation. He argued that a local government's law-making ability should not override Constitutional safeguards, and the Supreme Court unanimously agreed. This landmark decision confirmed that the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment applies in the context of legislatively imposed impact fees, overruling previous California jurisprudence.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.