Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Developers and Property Owners to Challenge Excessive or Unjustified Impact Fees
An impact fee is a one-time payment levied onto a property developer by a local government meant to offset the new development's impact on public infrastructure. Impact fees frequently seen include water, wastewater, stormwater, roads, mobility, parks and recreation, public safety, library facilities, public art, public administration buildings and facilities, schools, inclusionary housing, and other in-lieu-of-fees. For many years, these impact fee programs — even ones based on poor methodologies — often went largely unchallenged.
The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, No. 22–1074 (April 12, 2024), has empowered developers and property owners to challenge excessive or unjustified impact fees as unconstitutional and potentially seek damages and attorney fees. This in turn will cause many local governments to revisit the defensibility of their impact fee regimes.
In Sheetz, the plaintiff, George Sheetz, wanted to build a modest home in a quiet El Dorado, California neighborhood, on his residential parcel of land. However, the county required him to pay a $23,420 traffic impact fee to obtain relevant construction permits. Sheetz challenged this fee as an unlawful "exaction" of money under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits the government from taking private property without just compensation. He argued that a local government's law-making ability should not override Constitutional safeguards, and the Supreme Court unanimously agreed. This landmark decision confirmed that the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment applies in the context of legislatively imposed impact fees, overruling previous California jurisprudence.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
