Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For many businesses grappling with financial strain in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) has been a tremendous lifeline. This refundable tax credit aimed to incentivize businesses that either faced government-mandated shutdowns or experienced significant declines in gross receipts during 2020 and 2021 to keep employees on their payrolls.
While the ERC's primary goal was to incentivize businesses to retain employees amid unprecedented challenges, the process of applying for and receiving the credit (which often involves tax refund claims) has not been without its complications and controversies. Fraudulent claims and aggressive marketing tactics by those promoting entitlement to these credits have led to significant scrutiny and enforcement efforts by the IRS pushing back on a sizable number of claims and delaying the refund process for validly filed claims.
On July 26, the IRS identified several warning signs that may indicate a business's ineligibility for the ERC. These include:
The IRS's battle against ERC fraud is far from over. The agency's compliance efforts remain robust, encompassing a variety of initiatives designed to root out improper claims and promote transparency:
In response to widespread fraudulent claims and aggressive marketing tactics by some promoters, the IRS placed a temporary moratorium on processing ERC claims filed after Sept. 14, 2023. This pause allowed the IRS to implement additional safeguards to prevent ineligible businesses from receiving refunds and to combat deceptive practices.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?