Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Should Large Law Firms Penalize RTO Rebels or Explore Alternatives?

By Anthony Davies
October 01, 2024

The shift back to in-office work presents a significant challenge for large law firms that have embraced remote work over the past few years. According to our recent survey, the vast majority of firms already had an RTO policy in place by 2023; however, also at that time, compliance was at an all-time low where firms reported a shocking 94% of their attorneys were not compliant with policy.

In 2024, while many firms are improving these numbers and getting their attorneys back into the office, a small number of attorneys resist, and the question is how to get the resisters to comply with policy. Whether it's because of lease obligations, mentorship, culture, or all of the above, firms have turned up their efforts to get their attorneys back into the office.

Increasingly, firms are getting serious about enforcing compliance through punitive measures — here are some of the most newsworthy steps firms are taking:

  • Reducing or eliminating remote privileges: Several big-name firms are even backtracking their previous embrace of flexible work policies and now embracing a culture of punishment to enforce compliance. (See, "Cravath Backtracks Flexible Work," Above the Law.)
  • Increased oversite: Some firms have taken the tack of increasing oversight of their attorneys from sending monthly reports tracking i-office attendance, holding check-ins with non-compliant attorneys, and issuing warnings from practice group leaders or firm leadership. (See, "Top 50 Law Firms Cracking Down on In-Office Attendance," Above the Law.)

It all comes from the top down, of course, which is why some firms are toying with the idea of creating rules around partner time in the office as well, but this remains to be seen. (See, "Biglaw Firm's Leader Thinks Partners Need To Return To The Office To Guide Associates Back," Above the Law)

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Top 5 Strategies for Managing the End-of-Year Collections Frenzy Image

End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.

The Self-Service Buyer Is On the Rise Image

Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.

Should Large Law Firms Penalize RTO Rebels or Explore Alternatives? Image

Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.

Sink or Swim: The Evolving State of Law Firm Administrative Support Image

The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?

Tax Treatment of Judgments and Settlements Image

Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.