Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
By John Manganaro
With Republicans poised to take control of the White House and Congress, the odds are high that key elements of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act set to expire at the end of 2025 will in fact be extended — potentially for the better part of the next decade.
Still, given the relatively narrow majorities expected in both the House and the Senate, the exact path forward for tax reform and broader federal budget negotiations also includes some unknowns.
Could a fight over the state and local tax deduction cap split Republicans? Will changes to Social Security taxes be part of the process? What about the pledged elimination of taxes on tips and overtime?
Those questions all remain open, according to a webcast by Anna Tylor and Jonathan Traub, two Washington-based tax policy experts with Deloitte. Adding to the uncertainty is the scale (and commensurate price tag) of the many policy pledges made on the campaign trail by Donald Trump, the president-elect.
Simply put, some tax cuts or immigration policy priorities will have to be deprioritized if Republican leadership hopes to avoid dramatically expanding the deficit.
Probably the likeliest path forward, according to Taylor and Traub, is a reconciliation-based process that will allow Republican leaders to move relatively quickly on a “core TCJA extension” while avoiding a filibuster threat in the Senate.
This pathway could deliver tax policy success for Republicans during the first half of 2025 — potentially as soon as March in their best-case scenario — but also narrow the scope of what can be accomplished. That’s because the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act limits the use of reconciliation in some key ways.
“For example, because of the way the rules work, the president would very likely be unable to achieve his goal of eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits within a package that depended on reconciliation,” Taylor said. “But the core provisions of the TCJA are all fair game.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.