Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) granted certiorari to decide a $43 million suit between two real estate developers over the name “Dewberry.” This stems from an Aug. 9, 2023, decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit which affirmed a lower court ruling that found Atlanta, Georgia-based Dewberry Group, Inc. (DGI) “pervasively breached [prior agreement] over Dewberry Engineers’ objection,” and awarded attorneys’ fees and equitable profit disgorgement. Dewberry Engineers Inc. v. Dewberry Group, Inc., 77 F.4th 265, 294 (4th Cir. 2023). The crux of the case once it reached SCOTUS is the extent to which courts can award the profits, not of the named defendant, but of the defendant’s affiliate for trademark infringement.
Dewberry Engineers Inc. (DEI), a Virginia-based real estate developer, owns federal trademark rights to the DEWBERRY mark. On the heels of years of disputes over the “Dewberry” name, DEI brought suit claiming DGI’s rebranding efforts infringed the DEWBERRY mark and breached a confidential settlement agreement previously reached between DEI and DGI, signed in 2007.
The confidential settlement agreement allowed DEI to use its registered marks freely and prevented DGI from challenging the registrations. The agreement also strictly limited DGI’s use of the DEWBERRY mark. However, the agreement dissolved in 2017 when DGI’s decision to rebrand took effect with the launch of a new hotel in South Carolina, adoption of new sub-brands, and further creation of a new logo. DGI’s owner, John Dewberry, did not inform the then general counsel of the prior litigation with DEI or the confidential settlement agreement.
DEI’s first cease-and-desist letter to DGI was sent on December 27, 2017, for these efforts and the subsequent U.S. trademark application filing for DEWBERRY GROUP. In June 2018, DEI sent its second cease-and-desist letter demanding that DGI withdraw new mark applications for additional marks incorporating DEWBERRY. In addition, DEI challenged these applications with the USPTO. DEI filed suit in May 2020 claiming breach of contract and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act and Virginia common law.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A Q&A with conference speaker Ryan Phelan, a partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun and founder and moderator of legal blog PatentNext, to discuss how courts and jurisdictions are handling novel technologies, the copyrightability of AI-assisted art, and more.
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.