Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
You’ve worked to come up with a brand that you are proud of that embodies the promise your company makes to consumers with its products and services. You registered your trademark and worked to infuse the mark with your brand message. But then you see someone else using a similar mark that seems too close to your own. “They can’t do that,” the CEO tells legal. “Make them stop!”
There is a lot to go into concerning enforcement of trademark rights and the requirements to carry a claim of infringement under the law. But short of all that, what is seen as a simple demand letter should be carefully considered before you send such a shot across the bow. Sometimes your fire will be returned, and you have to be ready for it.
First, all the i’s must be dotted and t’s crossed to be sure that you actually have the senior rights in your mark. While this Johnny-come-lately may be new to you, it may have actually preexisted you and have seniority. You just don’t know what you don’t know and it is imperative to confirm seniority before making any contact concerning the mark. After all, if you are the junior user, your letter will likely be met with something to the effect of “thanks for letting us know — we agree there is confusion and you need to immediately cease use of your infringing mark.” In that case your metaphoric pounding of the table concerning the likelihood of confusion between the marks is not going to do you any favors. Trademark use investigation services are a great tool to make such a determination.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.