Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A partner’s tax basis in his partnership interest (outside basis) generally represents his economic investment in a partnership plus his share of the partnership’s liabilities. In many cases, a partner’s outside basis will correspond to his share of the partnership’s tax basis in its assets (inside basis). However, there are situations when the two can differ, and various transactions can result in adjustments to the tax basis of a partnership’s property.
If a partnership makes a distribution of property to a partner, the partner generally receives a tax basis in the distributed property equal to the partnership’s inside basis in the property. However, if the partnership’s inside basis in the property was higher than the partner’s outside basis in his partnership interest, the partner’s basis in the distributed property is limited to his outside basis.
In addition, if a partner receives a liquidating distribution of property from a partnership, the partner’s basis in the distributed property will equal his outside basis (reduced by any money received in the same transaction). Therefore, the basis of the distributed property in the hands of the partner may be adjusted to be higher or lower than the partnership’s inside basis in the distributed property.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.