Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is well-established that, in general, for a trademark owner to have standing to assert rights in a mark in the United States, the mark must be in use in the United States. Occasionally a U.S. court has recognized cross-border rights, where a product is in such wide use in a neighboring jurisdiction that it is effectively in use in the United States even if not directed at the United States. In a more recent case, although finding no standing in the case in front of it, a federal court noted that it was, however, possible that a nonuser could demonstrate entitlement to cancel or oppose by establishing either lost sales in the United States or reputational injury in the United States under 15 U.S.C. Section 1064(3), better known as Section 14(3) of the Lanham Act. See, Meenaxi Enterprise v. Coca-Cola, 38 F.4th 1067 (Fed. Cir. 2022). This section, which does not require that the party relying on it have a registration or use in the United States, provides grounds for attacking a trademark application or registration if, among other things, the mark at issue is being used to misrepresent the source of goods or services.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has now picked up that hypothetical and made it a reality in one of the first of its 2025 precedential decisions, sustaining Plumrose Holding Ltd.’s opposition to the attempted registration by USA Ham LLC of its mark “LA MONTSERRATINA” (the opposed mark) in the logo form pictured here for various meat products:
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A Q&A with conference speaker Ryan Phelan, a partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun and founder and moderator of legal blog PatentNext, to discuss how courts and jurisdictions are handling novel technologies, the copyrightability of AI-assisted art, and more.
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.