Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

As Rates Soar, Some Firms Profit by Coming Down to Earth

By Nell Gluckman
November 01, 2016

With overall law firm billing rates rising fast, firms that increased their rates more slowly are reaping rewards in the form of greater revenue growth, according to a new study. The report, “Does Slower Rate Growth Increase Revenues?,” issued last month by Thomson Reuters' Peer Monitor, found that when firms increase their rates at a slower pace, they also see an increase in demand from clients, even as demand has been stagnant across the industry. See, http://bit.ly/2eBLXNF. “We've been making the case that demand has been flat over the years,” says Leonard Lee, an analyst at Peer Monitor. But while demand for legal services has generally reached a plateau, some firms are getting much more work than others. Lee says Peer Monitor wanted to know what separates the firms enjoying increased demand, measured as hours billed, from those that have seen a slowdown. “Earlier this year, we started to notice this trend with rates. Firms that are willing to take less of a rate increase seem to be doing better with demand.” The study found that in the first half of 2015, Am Law 100 firms increased their rates by 3% and demand grew by 1.3%. In the first half of this year, the largest firms pushed up rates more sharply, increasing them by 3.3%, and demand subsequently fell 0.2%. The same holds true for Am Law Second Hundred firms, which have seen a very gradual increase in rate growth since 2014, according to the report. Demand went from growing 1.4% in the first half of 2014 to a drop of 1% in the first half of this year, Peer Monitor found. Midsized firms, in contrast, seemed to benefit from a gentler approach to billing rates. They've gradually slowed their rate increases since 2014, and both demand and revenue have started to grow. In 2014, demand fell by 0.8%, but in the first half of this year, it grew by 1.6%. The report cautioned that reducing rates or growing them at a slower pace is not a sure-fire way to increase revenue. There are other factors that may explain the slowdown in demand at Am Law Second Hundred firms, such as a drop in realization rates and changing client preferences. “Over the last few years, a lot of work seems to be moving down market,” Lee says, noting that midsized firms are having a good year financially, compared with firms in the Second Hundred. The figures reported in the Peer Monitor study are averages and every firm is different, but Lee says the findings show a clear correlation between rate growth and revenue. “Firms that are willing to slow their rate increases are seeing higher average growth in demand and revenue than firms that are raising rates more aggressively,” the report concluded.

***** Nell Gluckman writes for The Am Law Daily, an ALM sibling of this newsletter. She can be contacted at [email protected] or on Twitter @NellGluckman.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.