Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
One of the most striking developments in 2016 and continuing into the new year has been the rise of “fake news,” which stormed the social media landscape and became so integrated into the mainstream that many believe it played an essential role in putting Donald Trump in office.
The term “fake news” refers to fictitious content that attempts to (and all too often does) appear as factual, and is often featured on falsified websites designed to appear as legitimate media outlets. The goal of fake news is to trigger viral sharing across Facebook, Twitter and other social media, resulting in advertising dollars for its producers.
The widespread dissemination and consumption of fake news has significant implications — not only for the public, but also for the manner in which law firms and other companies market their brands. The success of fake news provides many valuable lessons to legal marketers looking to enhance their firms' positions or to defend their reputations from unwarranted attacks. Due to the increasingly suspect nature of digital information, law firms must also take greater care to effectively and ethically communicate their messaging to clients, policymakers and other influential players in the legal realm.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.