Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Review Marketing Becomes Top Priority for 2017

By Larry Bodine
February 01, 2017

In a recent episode of “Black Mirror,” now streaming on Netflix, a woman needs a higher rating on her profile to get a better apartment. In every daily interaction, people rate her and she rates them back with her cell phone. She has a 4.2 rating, but needs a coveted 4.5 rating from premium users. A bright smile in an elevator wins her points on her online profile. However, an outburst of anger leads to a low rating and she's kicked out of a wedding and jailed.

Doesn't this spooky story ring true in real life today?

We can all thank Amazon.com for changing the way that Americans make decisions. It pioneered easy online reviews of products, services, delivery and customer service. Clients today are presented with heart, star, thumbs up, and number ratings on nearly everything.

For many CMOs, the top priority for 2017 will be review marketing. Many law firms are still coming to grips with the reality that client reviews about them are online everywhere. But now, a turning point has been reached so that they can no longer be ignored.

“Many lawyers who say they get all their business from referrals are likely to lose clients to their competitors, because of their online reputation or the lack of one,” says attorney Dan Jaffe, CEO of LawLytics. “A good client who had a solid case will decide to hire a different lawyer than the one he was referred to, because he had a better rating on Yelp or Avvo.”

Make or Break Your Business

The tipping point was the moment that online reviews started affecting referrals:

  • Today, 88% of consumers trust online reviews as much as personal recommendations. See https://goo.gl/3OVbsk;
  • In December 2016, Pew Internet Research stated, “Fully 82% of U.S. adults say they at least sometimes read online customer ratings or reviews.” See https://goo.gl/mSpFFD;
  • This corroborates the 2014 research that 83% of consumers use online review sites as the first step in searching for an attorney. See https://goo.gl/hSkptU.

“Not monitoring your online reviews, not carefully tending to those who take the time to post a positive or negative review, is going to make or break your business,” writes marketing consultant Susan Cartier Liebel.

The fact that a review could affect the revenue of a law firm sparked many CMOs to pay attention. A one-star increase on Yelp leads to a 5% to 9% increase in revenue of a business, according to Harvard Business School. See https://goo.gl/wSCUcM. Many CMOs are still in disbelief that Yelp, a site where hot dog stands are reviewed, is the most popular and trusted review site for law firms. See https://goo.gl/tw8p2U.

Online reviews are so commonplace that already around one-in-ten Americans nearly always post their own reviews of products, services, and restaurants. See https://goo.gl/mSpFFD.

In fact, I've written so many reviews myself on TripAdvisor, the travel site, that it awarded me 11 badges for being a top reviewer and it seduces me to write more by telling me how many hundreds of people worldwide have read them.

It's time for law firms to get in on the action. The description of the activity is called reputation management or review marketing, and happily, it's not that difficult. Jaffe advises law firms to do three things:

  1. Monitor the review sites and take note when a new review is posted about you.
  2. Distribute a positive review across the internet and social media so that your best reviews are noticed.
  3. Acquire new reviews by making it simple for happy clients to write them.

Software like Birdeye can automate all three steps, but more about that later.

Oh, No! Bad Reviews!

Meanwhile, what about the likelihood of bad reviews? The possibility of a negative review still drives many law firms from even contemplating review marketing. Recent reactions from law firms to bad reviews include a Houston law firm suing a woman for a bad review on Facebook last year. See https://goo.gl/MK5LVk. In another case, a Florida lawyer who was smeared in a review on Avvo recovered a $350,000 verdict, which was affirmed on appeal. See https://goo.gl/5fIawN.

A better approach is the one perfected by hotel managers. They watch review sites with a close eye. When they spot a bad review, they respond with: 1) I'm so sorry that you are not happy with your stay at our hotel; 2) because our aim is to give everyone five-star service; 3) so I invite you to call me at the following phone number; and 4) take this conversation off-line; 5) because we would like to understand your feelings and learn where our service fell short; 6) so that we can improve and do better next time; 7) and perhaps convince you to take down your negative review; 8) and hope we can avoid getting another bad review in the future.

It's a simple (1) through (8) approach that any law firm can use.

The fire-and-brimstone approach may work sometimes in legal warfare, but review marketing requires a more sophisticated touch. Libel and slander aside, the idea is not to kill the messenger — but rather to encourage more messengers to carry good news.

The starting point is to claim all of your law firm's online directory listings and verify all the listings. In doing this, it is essential that you consistently enter the firm's “NAP” which stands for “Name, Address, and Phone Number.” For example, if you have a toll-free number and a local number for your firm and you include both of them in your Google+ Local listing, you should include both of them for all your other listings. Google uses this information to rank search results, particularly for local review sites.

Check in places a business firm might not think of:

  • Google maps, Bing and Yahoo maps.
  • Google+ Local and Yahoo Local.
  • Citysearch.
  • Superpages.
  • YP.com.
  • Insider Pages.
  • MerchantCircle.
  • Thumbtack.
  • Foursquare.
  • Yelp.

Aren't these consumer review sites? Yes, and you should register so that you know when there is a new review.

Also, register or claim your profile with the usual legal suspects:

  • Avvo.
  • Lawyers.com.
  • Martindale Hubbell.
  • Justia.
  • Lawyer Legion.
  • Lawdeeda.
  • Lawyer Central.

Promoting Good Reviews

At this point, a CMO can set up Google Alerts for each directory to find out about new reviews, or instead, use review-tracking software to do it for you. Birdeye, which I mentioned earlier, or similar monitoring software has a function that sends an alert for each new review. It also sorts reviews by publisher and date.

Assuming it's a rave, the next step is to put the review on your website and send the link out to the firm's Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Google+ accounts. (Your firm does have these social media sites set up … right?) Birdeye does this with one click.

Hootsuite software also works great to create a single social media message for each social medium, to insert a graphic and to post it simultaneously. I use Hootsuite to manage all the social media accounts of several organizations.

The Shouse Law Firm in California celebrates online reviews with gusto. They assemble positive reviews online at https://goo.gl/HMI6FC, including links to Google, Yelp, Facebook, Avvo, the Better Business Bureau and a Birdeye mini site. Their Facebook page is similarly brimming with positive reviews at https://goo.gl/bt7DnB and a cheery request to “Leave Us Feedback.”

A clever feature of Birdeye is that it automatically creates the mini-site where only positive reviews are displayed. The Shouse law firm's mini-site at https://goo.gl/TVMip4 scrolls on with screen after screen of 5-star reviews. The mini-site tends to rank high in Google searches, too. For example, see the constellation of 5-star reviews on the mini-site of Sackstein, Sackstein & Lee in Garden City, NY, at https://goo.gl/Pi8s1a.

Getting New Positive Reviews

The tricky part can be generating new positive reviews. Some CMOs have set up elaborate onboarding processes to identify which online review sites or social media their new clients already belong to. Other firms help clients to open memberships in review sites, warning them carefully not to post them while on the law firm premises (the review sites pay attention to the IP address where the review was posted). Still other firms distribute cards or printouts explaining how to register for a review site.

Birdeye circumvents the problem by enabling CMOs to send a text or email to a client asking, “Did you think your service was above average? (or a similar question).

  • For those who choose “Yes,” icons are displayed for Google, Yelp, Facebook or whichever site the firm wants a review. The firm doesn't need to explain the setup to post a review, because the software guides them through the process.
  • For those who choose “No,” a message appears saying, “We apologize your experience was not great. How can we improve? Please tell us about your experience.” This information is not posted online, but instead is sent to the CMO, providing an opportunity to make the client feel better.

“You must reinforce your website on third-party websites that you don't control. When your clients' experiences are consistent across your website and review sites, it reinforces a positive narrative in their mind and they become more likely to hire you,” says Jaffe. He has a free web- inar about online reputation management at http://bit.ly/2jRkhaD.

“A law firm's online reputation is vital to success. Make sure your firm has a five-star strategy for online reviews,” says attorney and writer Brendan Conley. “Online reviews are the perfect union of our modern online world and the traditional notion that an attorney's reputation should be built on word of mouth. Internet reviews are the online manifestation of a law firm's reputation, and they should command the firm's attention.”

***** Larry Bodine, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is Senior Legal Marketing Strategist at LawLytics, a law firm marketing technology and techniques website based in Tucson, AZ.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.