Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
I have heard it said many times that one of lawyers' foibles is their love of “shiny new toys” At the moment, it looks like video is the “shiny new toy” — everybody is trying it and everybody wants to use it — but few are doing it successfully. One might ask, why then are too many law firm videos so bad? Here are a few of the issues faced by many of the current batch of bad law firm videos.
Talking Heads
Many law firm videos feature either one attorney (or maybe two) discussing a legal issue. (Yawn, yawn. Bore, bore.) No one wants to watch five minutes (or even two minutes …) of someone droning on about a dry legal subject. Instead of just talking into the camera, think about the best presentation you ever heard. The speaker probably had some (not a ton of) great slides that illustrated the point she was trying to make. Consider interspersing your comments with visuals (like slides) or imagery of some kind. Also, consider other visual ways you can communicate your message.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?