Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As marketing executives, we know our firms ought to be doing video marketing. We've heard over and over that video marketing can enhance SEO, that Google loves videos because they own YouTube, and Google and YouTube are the two most visited websites. We also understand that video allows us to connect with audiences in ways that the written word never will.
If your firm has not yet joined the video marketing revolution, there is still plenty of room on the bandwagon. In fact, many of the country's largest firms still have no online video presence. It's time to take advantage of this increasingly essential marketing tool.
The Facts
While other types of consumer-driven businesses have jumped into YouTube with both feet, the legal industry has been slow to adapt. Of the AmLaw 100 firms, 69 have YouTube channels, and most of those firms have only dipped their toes in the water. (As of January, only 31 of those firms have 50 or more videos on their channels.) But their videos do get seen: the average number of channel subscribers among the AmLaw 100 is 109 and a handful have over 400 subscribers each. That's subscribers, people who want to show their support for the firm or proactively be informed of new videos posted. That doesn't include all of the non-subscriber traffic and impressions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?